Sotomayor: A Moderate on Business Issues
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor's record is mixed on issues important
to the business community
By Steve LeVine
and Theo Francis
Federal Appellate Judge Sonia Sotomayor, nominated May 26 by President Barack
Obama to the U.S. Supreme Court, has earned a centrist reputation in business
cases: In 1995, she sided with Major League Baseball players in a confrontation
with owners over free agency and arbitration, but 11 years later she rejected a
petition by millions of investors that alleged rigging of initial public
offerings in the dot-com boom.
The 54-year-old Sotomayor was first appointed to the federal bench by
President George H.W. Bush in 1992. Six years later, President Bill Clinton
elevated her to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Rulings on Punitive Damages
"Judge Sotomayor has a track record of moderation on issues of importance to
the business community," said Evan M. Tager, an appeals specialist at Mayer
Brown in Washington, D.C.
One issue certain to be raised by conservative U.S. senators in the
confirmation process is the issue of punitive damages in civil suits. Tager,
whose firm examined the records of the handful of top candidates to succeed
retiring Justice David Souter, says that on the bench Sotomayor has "expressed
unease" about large punitive awards, yet has upheld large awards "when the ratio
of punitive to compensatory damages is modest."
Souter himself voted against what critics called excessive punitive awards.
Thomas H. Dupree Jr., an appellate lawyer with Gibson,
Dunn & Crutcher, said he expects Sotomayor to "recognize the need to
rein in arbitrary and excessive punitive damage awards."
Such a position fits with the alignment of the court on business issues. In
social and civil cases, the court has routinely split 4-4, on
conservative-liberal lines, with one of the justices serving as a swing vote.
But the lines have blurred significantly in business cases. "Based on her
record, it is very likely that she will align herself with the more liberal side
of the court" on social and civil cases, Dupree said. "[Yet] while no one would
call Judge Sotomayor stridently pro-business, there are many business issues
that cut across the traditional liberal and conservative ideological lines."
In class actions, Sotomayor has occupied a strict middle ground, her record
reflecting sympathy neither for those in favor of such issues, nor skepticism of
them. "She looks at each case on its unique facts to determine whether a class
action is appropriate," said Tager.
Centrist on Preemption
Another hot-button issue is preemption, or the right of federal courts to
step in to cases involving state law. Tager said on this issue, too, Sotomayor
has been centrist. "She has been evenhanded in cases raising federal preemption
as a defense, finding preemption about half of the time and rejecting preemption
about half of the time," Tager said.
In the 1995 baseball case, Sotomayor earned high marks from players when she
ruled that owners could not unilaterally discard the two-decade-old system of
free agency. In the 2006 case, she voted not to allow dot-com investors to sue
to recover fees they said they wrongly paid to banks in initial public
offerings, a victory hailed by Wall Street.
On discrimination in employment, Sotomayor has probably sided more with
employees than employers, but has been "balanced overall," said Patricia
Millett, co-leader of Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld's Supreme Court and appellate practice.
On environmental law, Sotomayor was reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court in a
high-profile case in which she ruled that a law requiring companies to use the
best available technology to prevent endangered animals from being sucked into
water intakes in power plants, for example, meant just that.
Millett said that decision does not necessarily indicate a hard-line attitude
by Sotomayor toward the environment. "She was taking the statute at its word, so
I don't think you can really read much into it," Millett said.
After graduating from Yale Law School and spending five years as an assistant
state prosecutor in Manhattan under famed DA Robert Morgenthau, Sotomayor spent
not quite a decade in private practice—from the mid-1980s to the early 1990s. At
New York-based Pavia & Harcourt, which emphasizes its international
commercial practice and counts international companies and French and Italian
government agencies among its clients, she focused in part on copyright, patent,
and other intellectual-property law and antitrust issues. With
intellectual-property cases increasingly significant on the Supreme Court's
docket, Millett said, "It's incredibly important for the court to have someone
with a background like that."
LeVine is a
correspondent in BusinessWeek's Washington bureau. Francis is a correspondent in
BusinessWeek's Washington bureau.